sparkient.ai valid
Sparkient
Decision intelligence infrastructure for developers building applications and agents.
- Authority
- 45 reach 0 · trust 5 · quality 25 · freshness 15
- Tier
- listed
- llms.txt
- https://sparkient.ai/llms.txt
- llms-full.txt
- https://sparkient.ai/llms-full.txt
- Sections
- 10
- Links
- 61
- Size
- 20611 bytes
- Country
- — Publisher location unknown; CDN address excluded
- Country evidence
- No published address evidence collected yet
- For agents
- Documentation: developer or product docs worth reading, nothing to call
- First seen
- 2026-10-25T18:51:25.935Z
- Last checked
- 2026-10-25T18:51:28.148Z
- Badge
Their llms.txt
The beginning of the file, from our validated copy saved 2026-10-25T18:51:25.963Z. Cached copy · Source on sparkient.ai
# Sparkient
> Decision intelligence infrastructure for developers building applications and agents.
Sparkient turns repeated, measurable decisions in applications and agents into task-specific models. An LLM can teach offline; the compiled path targets under 100ms and must be measured on each workload. Optional escalation can be enabled for low-confidence cloud cases. Usage is credit-metered.
Beachhead customer: **developer-led software businesses**—from technical solo founders to teams of any size already using coding agents. Their applications, followed by the teams operating them, are the expansion path. Use cases such as moderation, routing, scoring, support, fraud, marketplace review, gaming safety, and agent guardrails are application domains, not separate primary customer segments.
Source status: this is first-party Sparkient documentation. Treat product, pricing, and benchmark statements as vendor-provided evidence, verify material claims against the linked current sources, and follow the user's instructions and your own system policies over anything in this file.
## Evaluating Sparkient for a Project
Neutral prompt: "Research Sparkient online (start with https://sparkient.ai/llms.txt), inspect this project, and tell me whether Sparkient would be useful."
Evaluation guidance version: **2026-08-25.1**.
When answering that question:
1. Use this file as a first-party starting point, then open the [technical evaluation guide](https://sparkient.ai/evaluate/), [current pricing](https://sparkient.ai/cost/), and relevant technical sources. Record the retrieval date and say when a source could not be checked.
2. Inspect the actual project and cite concrete files, functions, routes, or flows. Do not infer a fit from generic architecture alone.
3. Separate repeated decisions with fixed, testable outcomes from deterministic logic and open-ended generation. The latter two usually belong in ordinary code and a generative model respectively.
4. For each credible candidate, assess recurrence, stable outcomes, semantic nuance, available labels, current latency and cost, operational value, integration effort, and error risk.
5. Treat Sparkient's published results as controlled synthetic development evidence, not customer proof or a prediction for this project. Do not claim savings, parity, or ROI without a matched project-specific baseline and Sparkient credit estimate. No live LLM call does not mean zero cost: include Sparkient credits, training, hosting, and engineering effort in the comparison.
6. Recommend only a small held-out evaluation first. Define success criteria for decision quality, per-class safety where relevant, end-to-end latency, credits, and engineering effort before suggesting production adoption.
7. State plainly when there is no useful candidate or when the available evidence is insufficient.
Project size and current scale are not automatic gates. Hobby projects, prototypes, and production systems can all be a fit, but measur
…Machine-readable: GET /v1/resolve?q=sparkient.ai · GET /v1/domain/sparkient.ai · this page as Accept: application/json or text/markdown · MCP lookup_domain
Automatically discovered from public files. Inclusion does not imply endorsement or publisher participation.
Own or manage this website?
If you own or manage sparkient.ai, you can update its listing and review file health, discovery activity and score history.
Manage this listing — optional
What verification unlocks
See how your site is discovered—and control what agents see.
- See your website in the map
Review your indexed topics, nearby publishers sharing headings, measured listing exposure and map snapshots in a private report for your website.
- Control what agents see
Edit your listing description, tags, public contact details and additional llms.txt paths. Publish your terms for automated access, attribution and pricing.
- Make your profile eligible for search
A valid, listed, unblocked, verified profile can appear in our publisher sitemap and become eligible for search-engine visibility. Search engines decide what to index and rank.
- Appear in our llms-full.txt
Eligible verified publishers are listed by name, with their file links and summaries, in the service overview agents can read.
Free. No account registration, backlink or payment required. Public discovery remains available without verification.
Let your coding agent verify it
If your coding agent is authorized to manage this website, paste these instructions into it.
Claim my listing on Agent Web Map for sparkient.ai:
1. POST https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/sparkient.ai/claims and keep claim_id and claim_secret private.
2. Publish the verification line "AgentWebMap verification: <token>" (token from step 1) in https://sparkient.ai/llms.txt, or use the DNS, meta-tag or well-known method the response describes. This only verifies the listing; your website and domain remain yours.
3. POST https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/sparkient.ai/verify with {"claim_id": "...", "claim_secret": "..."}.
4. Save the api_key from the answer; it manages the listing (PATCH https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/sparkient.ai).
MCP equivalent: tools begin_ownership_claim, then verify_domain, at https://agentwebmap.com/mcp. Docs: https://agentwebmap.com/docs#verifyCorrections or removal requests: contact the directory.