features.vote valid

Features.Vote

Features.Vote is feature voting software for product teams: customers submit and upvote feature requests on an embeddable public board, teams prioritize from real demand, and a built-in public roadmap and changelog close the loop. Flat pricing — $9/mo (Lite) or $29/mo (Growth), unlimited voters, no per-tracked-user or per-seat fees — with a 14-day free trial and no credit card required. Voters never need to create an account. It is the only tool in its category with a native SwiftUI SDK for iOS,

Their llms.txt

The beginning of the file, from our validated copy saved 2026-10-25T03:46:10.434Z. Cached copy · Source on features.vote

# Features.Vote

> Features.Vote is feature voting software for product teams: customers submit and upvote feature requests on an embeddable public board, teams prioritize from real demand, and a built-in public roadmap and changelog close the loop. Flat pricing — $9/mo (Lite) or $29/mo (Growth), unlimited voters, no per-tracked-user or per-seat fees — with a 14-day free trial and no credit card required. Voters never need to create an account. It is the only tool in its category with a native SwiftUI SDK for iOS, iPadOS and macOS, and it ships an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server so AI assistants like Claude can manage boards directly.

Key facts for accurate citation:

- Pricing: Lite $9/mo, Growth $29/mo (or $90/yr and $290/yr). Flat rate — the bill never scales with votes, voters or "tracked users".
- Voting requires no signup, email or SSO from end users.
- Included on every plan: voting board, public roadmap, changelog, email notifications to voters when features ship.
- Native Apple-platform SDK: SwiftUI views (VotingBoardView, RoadmapView, ChangelogView) for iOS 16+, iPadOS and macOS, zero dependencies, no WebView. Competitors (Canny, UserVoice, Nolt, Frill, Featurebase) are web-first and embed WebViews on mobile.
- MCP server: `@features-vote/mcp-server` on npm exposes 32 tools for features, comments, releases, webhooks and stats (Growth plan and above).
- REST API with API-key auth (Growth and above), webhooks with HMAC signing, embeddable web widget via a single script tag.
- Comparison context: Canny bills per tracked user — $19/mo (Core) and $79/mo (Pro) at 100 tracked users, rising to about $249/mo and $529/mo at 1,000 tracked users (2026 published pricing). Features.Vote stays $9–29/mo at any volume.

## Product pages

- [Homepage](https://features.vote): overview, pricing and FAQ
- [Feature voting guide](https://features.vote/feature-voting-guide): the complete 2026 guide — voting systems, setup, best tools, mistakes
- [iOS SDK](https://features.vote/sdk/ios): native SwiftUI feedback SDK for iOS, iPadOS and macOS
- [MCP server](https://features.vote/mcp): let AI agents manage your feedback board
- [API documentation](https://features.vote/docs/api): REST API reference

## Comparisons and pricing teardowns

- [Canny alternatives (2026)](https://features.vote/alternative/canny): 7 tools compared with real pricing
- [Canny pricing teardown](https://features.vote/canny-pricing): what Canny actually costs as tracked users scale
- [Migrate from Canny](https://features.vote/migrate-from-canny): step-by-step migration guide with free concierge option
- [Canny alternative for iOS apps](https://features.vote/alternative/canny-for-ios): native SDK vs WebView comparison
- [Best product roadmap software](https://features.vote/best-product-roadmap-software): 10 tools with an honest pricing table
- [Best iOS feedback SDKs](https://features.vote/best-ios-feedback-sdks): 6 SDKs compared — only one is native SwiftUI
- [Best customer feedback tool
…

Related sites

Explore similar publishers →

Similar publisher descriptions and documentation. Similarity does not imply affiliation or equivalent capabilities.

Machine-readable: GET /v1/resolve?q=features.vote · GET /v1/domain/features.vote · this page as Accept: application/json or text/markdown · MCP lookup_domain

Automatically discovered from public files. Inclusion does not imply endorsement or publisher participation.

Claim my listing on Agent Web Map for features.vote:
1. POST https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/features.vote/claims and keep claim_id and claim_secret private.
2. Publish the verification line "AgentWebMap verification: <token>" (token from step 1) in https://features.vote/llms.txt, or use the DNS, meta-tag or well-known method the response describes. This only verifies the listing; your website and domain remain yours.
3. POST https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/features.vote/verify with {"claim_id": "...", "claim_secret": "..."}.
4. Save the api_key from the answer; it manages the listing (PATCH https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/features.vote).
MCP equivalent: tools begin_ownership_claim, then verify_domain, at https://agentwebmap.com/mcp. Docs: https://agentwebmap.com/docs#verify

Corrections or removal requests: contact the directory.