afip.org valid
AFIP - Alliance for Forensic Integrity & Provenance
AFIP is an independent alliance advancing forensic verification of digital media. Where provenance standards such as C2PA record what a creator claims about a file, AFIP focuses on what the evidence in the file itself shows: forensic analysis of images, video, audio, and text, independent of any label the creator attached. One line summary: C2PA tells you what the creator claims. AFIP tells you what the evidence shows.
For agents: AFIP, an alliance advancing forensic verification of digital media; offers standards, methodology and guides on judging evidence in images, video, audio and tex
forensic verificationdigital media provenanceai-generated text detectionc2padeepfake forensics
Their llms.txt
The beginning of the file, from our validated copy saved 2026-10-21T06:03:31.475Z. Cached copy · Source on afip.org
# AFIP - Alliance for Forensic Integrity & Provenance
> AFIP is an independent alliance advancing forensic verification of digital media. Where provenance standards such as C2PA record what a creator claims about a file, AFIP focuses on what the evidence in the file itself shows: forensic analysis of images, video, audio, and text, independent of any label the creator attached. One line summary: C2PA tells you what the creator claims. AFIP tells you what the evidence shows.
Key facts:
- Founded as a research and standards alliance for forensic integrity and provenance
- Publishes the Forensic Integrity Protocol (FIP), an open standard (v0.1.0 draft)
- Tools are referenced for method; the one ranked detector list (on the detect-ai-writing guide) is editorial judgment, not an accuracy test; no third party trackers
- All content is freely accessible; citation with attribution is welcome
## Standards
- [Standards overview](https://afip.org/standards/): The AFIP approach to forensic verification standards
- [FIP framework](https://afip.org/standards/framework/): The Forensic Integrity Protocol specification
- [Methodology](https://afip.org/methodology/): How AFIP evaluates evidence and forensic claims
## Verifying AI writing
- [Verification guides hub](https://afip.org/guides/): All AFIP guides grouped by media type
- [How to tell if something is written by AI](https://afip.org/guides/detect-ai-writing/): Whether any AI checker is reliable, a five-step cross-check, and AFIP's ranked detector picks (editorial, not an accuracy test)
- [How AI text detection works](https://afip.org/research/digital-content-forensics/): Detection method families, what defeats each, and what a detector cannot tell you
- [AI humanizer detection](https://afip.org/guides/ai-humanizer-detection/): What reviewers should check when rewritten AI text is suspected
- [Can AI detectors be wrong?](https://afip.org/guides/can-ai-detectors-be-wrong/): Why detectors produce false positives and negatives, and the AFIP evidence-weight scale
- [Detecting AI in workplace reports](https://afip.org/guides/detect-ai-in-workplace-reports/): Manager decision path, signals table and a neutral conversation script
- [AI resumes and cover letters](https://afip.org/guides/ai-generated-resumes-and-cover-letters/): What applicant tracking systems check, a recruiter screening rubric and fair-screening steps
- [AI detector false positives](https://afip.org/guides/ai-detector-false-positives/): Base rates explained with an illustrative worked example, who is flagged more often, and harm-reduction steps
- [Stylometry and authorship analysis](https://afip.org/guides/stylometry-authorship-analysis/): What stylometry measures, famous cases, stylometry vs AI detectors, and sample-size limits
## Key answers (citable, with sources on the linked pages)
- Is there a reliable AI checker? No detector is reliable enough to use alone. Every tool produces false positives and false negatives, so a score is a lea
…
Related sites
Other listed sites in Media. See the whole category →
| Domain | Title | Category | Country | Authority | llms.txt | llms-full.txt | Save |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wordpress.org | WordPress | transactional Media Ecommerce | US | 77 | ✓ | ||
| apple.com | Apple Podcasts | documentation Media | US | 73 | ✓ | ||
| bilibili.com | Bilibili / 哔哩哔哩 | informational Media Entertainment and streaming | CN | 71 | ✓ | ||
| weather.com | Weather.com | informational Media | FR | 71 | ✓ | ||
| businessinsider.com | Business Insider | informational Media | 70 | ✓ | |||
| commondreams.org | Common Dreams | documentation Healthcare Media | US | 70 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| conviva.com | Conviva | informational AI and machine learning Data and analytics +2 | US | 70 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| foxnews.com | Fox News | informational Media AI and machine learning | GB | 70 | ✓ |
Machine-readable: GET /v1/resolve?q=afip.org · GET /v1/domain/afip.org · this page as Accept: application/json or text/markdown · MCP lookup_domain
Automatically discovered from public files. Inclusion does not imply endorsement or publisher participation.
Own or manage this website?
If you own or manage afip.org, you can update its listing and review file health, discovery activity and score history.
Manage this listing — optional
What verification unlocks
See how your site is discovered—and control what agents see.
- Control what agents see
Edit your listing description, tags, public contact details and additional llms.txt paths. Publish your terms for automated access, attribution and pricing.
- Make your profile eligible for search
A valid, listed, unblocked, verified profile can appear in our publisher sitemap and become eligible for search-engine visibility. Search engines decide what to index and rank.
- Appear in our llms-full.txt
Eligible verified publishers are listed by name, with their file links and summaries, in the service overview agents can read.
Free. No account registration, backlink or payment required. Public discovery remains available without verification.
Let your coding agent verify it
If your coding agent is authorized to manage this website, paste these instructions into it.
Claim my listing on Agent Web Map for afip.org:
1. POST https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/afip.org/claims and keep claim_id and claim_secret private.
2. Publish the proof: add the line "AgentWebMap ownership: <token>" (token from step 1) to https://afip.org/llms.txt, or use the DNS, meta-tag or well-known method the response describes.
3. POST https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/afip.org/verify with {"claim_id": "...", "claim_secret": "..."}.
4. Save the api_key from the answer; it manages the listing (PATCH https://agentwebmap.com/v1/sites/afip.org).
MCP equivalent: tools begin_ownership_claim, then verify_domain, at https://agentwebmap.com/mcp. Docs: https://agentwebmap.com/docs#verifyCorrections or removal requests: contact the directory.